A660 Joint Council

Cycle Track Proposals

Headingley Hill (image courtesy of LCC).

Leeds City Council wants to establish a cycle track from the suburbs to the university. They intend consulting on their proposals for the section from Shaw Lane to the university from the 30th January to the 5th March. You can see their proposals and comment on them here.

Where the A660 crosses Woodhouse Moor, the council proposes:

The proposed cycle tracks would be 2 metres wide, which is the minimum width required for a cycle lane. It’s hard to understand why the space required for the proposed cycle tracks across Woodhouse Moor would be at the expense of the existing park, when there would also be a 2 metres wide segregated cycle lane across Headingley Hill, with no loss of pavement or moving of wall to achieve this.

There will be four drop-in sessions as follows:

I’ve summarised the council’s proposals below. Any language describing the proposals as “better” is the council’s.

Section 1: A660 Otley Road from Alma Road to Shire Oak Road

Grid A


Grid B


Section 2: A660 Otley Road/Headingley Lane, St Michael’s Road junction

Grid C


Section 3: A660 Headingley Lane from Spring Road to Grosvenor Road



Section 4: A660 Headingley Lane/Woodhouse Lane, Victoria Road junction

Grid D


Section 5: A660 Woodhouse Lane, Hyde Park Road junction (Hyde Park Corner) to Cliff Road

Grid E


*A qualified arborist has carried out a complete arboricultural tree survey of the 73 trees along this section of the A660. The council state that where possible they have sought to avoid impacting any trees however, these plans would impact 11 semi-mature trees. Varieties impacted include Oak, Lime and Sycamore – two are rated good quality with the remaining nine rated low quality.

All these trees were found to have a mixture of issues, including squirrel damage, soil compaction, root disturbance, close proximity to a bus shelter, girdling roots, or in a general poor condition.

The council state that in order to improve the design of our streets and make them wider and safer, they need to put people first. To achieve this along the A660, and particularly at this section of road where there is a high footfall of school students, they state that they need to remove these trees. Relocating the trees would not be possible due to the issues listed above. However, the council’s policy is to replace every tree removed with a 3:1 semi-mature ratio.

Section 6: A660 Woodhouse Lane, Rampart Road to Clarendon Road

Grid F


Grid G


Section 7: A660 Woodhouse Lane from St Mark’s Street to St Mark’s Road

Grid H


Grid I


Section 8: Continuous crossings at side roads

Section 9: Proposed segregated cycle path

Exit mobile version