An artist’s impression of what the new terminal will look like
Planning application 20/02559/FU is to add a new terminal and new parking provision at Leeds Bradford Airport. It also seeks to extend the airport’s daytime operating hours. The application was submitted to Leeds City Council on the 4th May 2020. Currently, the deadline for commenting on the application is the 4th June 2020.
The application also involves building additional infrastructure to support the new terminal, re-configuration of the existing car parking, a new meet and greet building, a new bus terminal and taxi drop off point.
Currently, the airport’s daytime operating hours are from 7am to 11pm. If the application is successful, the daytime operating hours would be from 6am to 11.30pm. Daytime operating hours are in addition to the “night quota.”
The new terminal would cost £150 million and would open in 2023. It would enable the airport to handle 7 million passengers per annum by 2030. Currently the airport is handling 4 million passengers per annum.
The airport’s owners claim that the current terminal, which opened in 1965, is outdated and inefficient, and needs to be replaced by a terminal with a smaller environmental footprint.
You can access the documents that were submitted with the application and comments that have already been made by clicking on this link. You can make a comment on the application by clicking on this link.
GALBA (Groups Against Leeds Bradford Airport) was formed to co-ordinate resistance to Leeds Bradford Airport’s proposed expansion. You can read their bulletin about the current planning application here.
In an article published this January, Car magazine, reported that Nottingham had won a £3.4 million government grant to trial inductive charging for its fleet of taxis. Initially, just ten taxis will participate in the trial, which involves induction loops and other infrastructure being installed at selected Nottingham taxi ranks, so that cabbies can charge their taxis whilst waiting for their fare. The trial is being run by Cenex, which describes itself as a low emissions vehicle research consultancy. Trials elsewhere in the country are being conducted by “Connected Kerb.” You can read more about these trials here.
A new Chinese study covering 324 cities has found that places with modestly higher levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution (10 micrograms per cubic metre) in the five years before the pandemic began had 22% more Covid-19 cases, whilst higher levels of small particle pollution saw a 15% rise. Another Chinese analysis of 120 cities also found a significant link. These studies are in addition to studies in Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States, which also suggest a link between Covid-19 and air pollution. Full details are available in this article published in today’s Guardian.
A vehicle charging point in Birmingham. Image courtesy of Andrew Roberts
An article published in Leeds Live in April 2019, claimed that Leeds is one of the worst cities in the UK for vehicle charging points. According to the article, there were just 58 vehicle charging points in Leeds at that time, several of which were not publicly accessible. Leeds City Council disputed the figure, claiming that it had around 70 charging points. A list published in March 2019 by Zap Map gave details of 88 charging points in Leeds. But even with 88 charging points, Leeds compares very badly with cities like Manchester and York.
The lack of charging point in Leeds means that we don’t suffer to the same extent as other cities from the problem of charging points located on pavements. These can make it very difficult for disabled people to get past. Living Streets is running a campaign to ensure that charging points are placed so that the passage of pedestrians is not obstructed. Let’s hope that new charging points in Leeds are located with consideration for others.
Today’s Guardian reports the findings of a study which has detected Coronavirus on particles of air pollution. It is not known yet if the virus remains viable on pollution particles and in sufficient quantity to cause disease. If it is, it would enable the virus to be carried over longer distances and increase the number of people infected.
Leonardo Setti at the University of Bologna in Italy, who led the work, said it was important to investigate if the virus could be carried more widely by air pollution. This would explain higher rates of infection in parts of northern Italy before a lockdown was imposed. The region is one of the most polluted in Europe.
Previous studies have shown that air pollution particles do harbour microbes and that pollution is likely to have carried the viruses causing bird flu, measles and foot-and-mouth disease over considerable distances.
Today’s Guardian reports the findings of a preliminary study which has found the first evidence of a link between higher levels of air pollution and deaths from Covid-19 in England.
The analysis showed that London, the Midlands and the north-west had the highest levels of nitrogen oxide and higher numbers of coronavirus deaths.
“Our study adds to growing evidence from northern Italy and the United States that high levels of air pollution are linked to deadlier cases of Covid-19,” said Miguel Martins, of the University of Cambridge, who led team which produced the new analysis.
Experts accept that air pollution may increase susceptibility to Covid-19, but warn that early studies must be treated very carefully.
Today’s Guardian reports on research published in the journal “Science of the Total Environment,” which shows that almost 80% of deaths across four countries were in the most polluted regions. The research examined levels of nitrogen dioxide, a pollutant produced mostly by diesel vehicles. “The results indicate that long-term exposure to this pollutant may be one of the most important contributors to fatality caused by the Covid-19 virus in these regions and maybe across the whole world,” said Yaron Ogen, at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg in Germany, who conducted the research. Professor Jonathan Grigg, from Queen Mary University of London, said the study showed an association between Covid-19 deaths and NO2 levels. The article states that long-term exposure to dirty air before the pandemic may be more important than current levels of pollution.
Waterfront development in Oslo. Image courtesy of Cycling Man
In 2019, Oslo (population 673,000) recorded zero pedestrian deaths. Several innovations achieved this. Over the previous five years, the city replaced almost all on-street parking with pavements and segregated bike lanes (over 1,000 parking spaces were removed). Major streets were closed to cars, and congestion charging raised the fee to drive into the city centre by 70%, with the aim of making most of the city car-free by 2019. Car parking charges were increased by 50%. Speed humps were introduced. The city also lowered the speed limit. The result was that in 2019, the city recorded zero pedestrian deaths. This is a significant improvement on an annual average death rate of 3.6 over the previous five years. By comparison, in 2018, there were 57 pedestrian deaths in London. Oslo’s “Vision Zero Strategy” aims for no traffic related fatalities or serious injuries on its roads. You can read more about the measures used to achieve Oslo’s zero fatality rate in this Guardian article.
From the 28th September 2020, high-emission HGVs and buses will be charged £50 per day to drive in the city. High-emission taxis and private hire vehicles will be charged £12.50 per day, and vehicles licensed with Leeds City Council will be eligible for a reduced £50 per week rate.
300 automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras have been installed at over a hundred junctions around the perimeter of the zone.
More than £5.4 million in financial support has been awarded to help local businesses switch to cleaner vehicles and an additional £3.1 million has been provisionally approved.
The zone was created after the Government told Leeds to tackle air pollution as soon as possible after finding that parts of the city would probably exceed legal air quality limits in 2020.
For more detailed information, please see the council’s web page.
In April 2012, a federal court in Leipzig ruled that the planned expansion of the airport could go ahead, provided that there was a permanent ban on night flights between 11pm and 5am. The ruling was the result of an action by local boroughs, residents and businesses concerned about the airport’s expansion plans. A temporary ban on night flights had been in place since October 2011. Lufthansa chief executive Christoph Franz says the ruling was a “heavy blow for Germany.” Frankfurt is Europe’s fourth busiest airport after Heathrow, Charles de Gaulle and Schiphol.